Bright v. Hanover Fire Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Black, J., entered December 21, 1906, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on a policy of fire insurance.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.
On the 80th day of December, 1905, O. L. Allen was the owner of a certain hotel building at Arlington, in Snohomish county, together with the furniture and fixtures therein situated. On the above date he entered into a contract with the plaintiff Bright, whereby he executed and placed in escrow a deed and bill of sale conveying and transferring the hotel building and personal property to the plaintiff. The escrow agreement provided that Allen should remove certain clouds and encumbrances against the property on or before March 15, 1906; that the plaintiff should deposit in escrow a conveyance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Havens v. Germania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Phenix Ins. v. KerrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Queen Insurance v. Jefferson Ice Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885
- Oshkosh Gas Light Co. v. Germania Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Phinizy v. GuernseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- DeWitt v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Kendall v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Vancouver National Bank v. KatzWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Tedford v. Security State Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Hight v. Maryland InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.