Legal Opinion

Bob Wilkes Falling, Inc. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 27, 1994No. 88-10-018; CA A77187PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, C. J.

SAIF Corporation seeks review of an order of the Department of Insurance and Finance (DIF)1 that disallowed premiums for workers’ compensation coverage that SAIF charged to Bob Wilkes Falling, Inc. (Wilkes) for two timber cutters associated with Wilkes.2 SAIF argues that DIF erred in concluding that the timber cutters were nonsubject workers who were exempt from workers’ compensation coverage by Wilkes under ORS 656.027(7).3 Because we conclude that the timber cutters were not “workers” and, therefore, not subject to workers’ compensation coverage, we affirm.

The basic facts are undisputed.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. S-W Floor Cover Shop v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Castle Homes, Inc. v. WhaiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Cy Investment, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Reforestation General Contractors, Inc. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edward Slayman v. Fedex Ground Package SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
  3. DCBS v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Department of Consumer & Business Services v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API