Legal Opinion
Richey v. Westinghouse Credit Corp.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 29, 1986No. CIV-86-1683-WPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LEE R. WEST, District Judge.
Defendant, Westinghouse Credit Corporation (“Westinghouse”) moves this Court to dismiss the first through seven causes of action, inclusive, of Plaintiffs Ron K. Richey, Glen D. Caíame, C.B. Hudson, Jr., Frank Jones, and Jim Moreland’s complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to §§ 12(1), 12(2), 15, and 17(a) of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77Z(1), 771(2), 77(o), 77q(a); 15 O.S. §§ 58 and 59; 23 O.S. § 9; 71 O.S. § 408; 76 O.S. § 2, et seq.; and common law.
When a motion to dismiss is…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. DanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Zola v. GordonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Bath v. Bushkin, Gaims, Gaines & JonasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Grider v. USX Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Bath v. BushkinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Buford White Lumber Co. Profit Sharing & Savings Plan & Trust v. Octagon Properties, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.