Legal Opinion
Bath v. Bushkin, Gaims, Gaines & Jonas
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 30, 1990No. Nos. 88-2587, 88-2659 and 88-2936PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Per curiam
By these consolidated appeals, plaintiffs seek review of a judgment of the district court dismissing their claims as time-barred.1 Bath v. Bushkin, Gaims, Gaines & Jonas, 695 F.Supp. 1156 (D.Wyo.1988). The facts underlying plaintiffs’ involvement in defendants’ tax shelter scheme are outlined adequately in Bath, 695 F.Supp. at 1158-1159, and we need not repeat them. Our resolution of this appeal turns on the answers to three questions:
1.Did the district court err in determining that plaintiffs’ alleged violations of Rule 10b-5 (17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (1989)) were time-barred based on a federal…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bankers Trust Company v. Daniel Rhoades, Herman Soifer and Milton BratenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Susan R. Wexner v. First Manhattan Co., John R. Loomis and Joseph Stein, Jr., Individually and as Co-Partners of First Manhattan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- In Re Data Access Systems Securities Litigation. Appeal of Tolins & Lowenfels & Roger A. Tolins. Appeal of I. Kahlowsky and Co. And Peter CunicelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Rotella v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Klehr v. A. O. Smith Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Grimmett v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Detrick v. Panalpina, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Agristor Financial Corp. v. Van SickleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.