Legal Opinion
Roneker v. Kenworth Truck Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 19, 1996No. 1:95-cr-00125PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties have consented to have the undersigned conduct all further proceedings in this matter, including entry of judgment, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Defendants Kenworth Truck Company (“Ken-worth”) and Detroit Diesel Corp. (“DDC”) have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the following reasons, defendants’ motions are granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff is a self-employed truck driver. On December 31, 1992, he purchased a 1993 Kenworth T600B…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Ora Lee Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, William Thorne v. Walker-Thomas Furniture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Traxler v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016
- Argabright v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- Bristol Village, Inc. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2016
- BOC Group, Inc. v. Chevron Chemical Co., LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.