Argabright v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, Chief Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Rheem Manufacturing Company’s (“Rheem” or “Rheem Manufacturing”) Motion .to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. [Docket Item 49.] In this putative multistate class action, Plaintiffs Lawrence Argabright (“Argabright”), Victoria Fecht (“Fecht”), and Librado Montano (“Monta-no”) allege that Defendant manufactured defective residential heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (“HVAC”) systems under the Rheem and Ruud brand names. Plaintiffs assert the following claims .in their Amended Complaint: breach of…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- BODDIE v. COMCAST (CC) OF WILLOW GROVEDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- BORNSTEIN v. MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- BURD v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- DIVALERIO v. BEST CARE LABORATORY, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- HODGES v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.