Day v. Robison
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiff sued for an injunction and damages for trespass; defendants cross-complained asserting an easement and seeking damages for failure of consideration. Judgment was entered awarding defendants an easement for ingress and egress and denying all further complaints.
Plaintiff as owner of a large tract of land in the city of Kentfield placed in the hands of a real estate broker the lot purchased by the defendants and delivered to him a map showing a road on the northerly and easterly sides of the lot and a 20-foot lane on the westerly side. The broker turned the lot over to another broker…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Danielson v. SykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Fristoe v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Davidow v. GriswoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Prescott v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ute Park Summer Homes Ass'n v. Maxwell Land Grant Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Neff v. ErnstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Boucher v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984