Legal Opinion

Boucher v. Boyer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 10, 1984No. 61, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

We shall decide in this case whether the appellants, whose property abuts a street that was dedicated to public use but was never accepted by the county government, have any property interest in that street under a theory of implied easement by virtue of a plat reference.

The facts are not in dispute. In 1972, George H. and Beverly L. Piper, owners of an approximately fifteen acre tract in Frederick County, Maryland, prepared and duly recorded a plat adopting a plan of subdivision for their property. This plat, entitled “Section One, Piper Estates” (Piper Estates), established two…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Knierim v. LeatherwoodTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Condry v. LaurieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  3. Overstreet v. Brookland, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Goldstein v. BealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Callahan v. ClemensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. FlippoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Wagner v. DoehringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Jurgensen v. New Phoenix Atlantic Condominium Council of Unit OwnersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Miller v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Clickner v. Magothy River Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API