Oppenhuizen v. City of Zeeland
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtE. E. Borradaile, J.
Plaintiffs filed a complaint for declaratory judgment and injunction in circuit court against defendant City of Zeeland on September 22, 1978, challenging an ordinance which prohibited the sale of liquor within the city. The circuit judge ruled the challenged section of the ordinance was preempted by state law and was thus void. Defendant appeals as of right.
The parties submitted the case on the following stipulated statement of facts:
"The plaintiffs, Emeline Oppenhuizen and Kemma J. Sneller, residents of the City of Zeeland, applied to the State of Michigan, Department of Commerce, Liquor…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. LlewellynMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Noey v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Richards v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- City of Kalamazoo v. TitusMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- National Amusement Co. v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rusha v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Ficano v. LucasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Ypsilanti Township v. Edward Rose Building Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Allen v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Stafford’s Restaurant, Inc v. City of Oak ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983