Legal Opinion
National Amusement Co. v. Johnson
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1935No. Docket No. 158, Calendar No. 38,203PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
This is a bill to restrain the enforcement of—
“An ordinance to preserve the public health and prohibit certain dangerous amusements and exhibitions in the city of Grand Rapids. * * *
“Section 1. No person shall procure or take part in any amusement or exhibition which shall result in ■ a contest to test the endurance of the participants. ’ ’
Plaintiffs claim the ordinance is invalid because it is in conflict with Act No. 65, Pub. Acts 1933, which reads:
“An act to regulate endurance contests known as walkathons and similar endurance contests; and to prescribe a penalty for the violation thereof.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schneiderman v. SesansteinOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- People v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. . BrittainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
3Cited by38 opinions
- Noey v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Richards v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Fox v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Miller v. Fabius Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Walsh v. City of River RougeMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.