Legal Opinion

National Amusement Co. v. Johnson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1935No. Docket No. 158, Calendar No. 38,203PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is a bill to restrain the enforcement of—

“An ordinance to preserve the public health and prohibit certain dangerous amusements and exhibitions in the city of Grand Rapids. * * *
“Section 1. No person shall procure or take part in any amusement or exhibition which shall result in ■ a contest to test the endurance of the participants. ’ ’

Plaintiffs claim the ordinance is invalid because it is in conflict with Act No. 65, Pub. Acts 1933, which reads:

“An act to regulate endurance contests known as walkathons and similar endurance contests; and to prescribe a penalty for the violation thereof.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schneiderman v. SesansteinOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. People v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State v. . BrittainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Noey v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Richards v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Fox v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Miller v. Fabius Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Walsh v. City of River RougeMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API