Rusha v. Department of Corrections
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMurray, J.
Defendant, Department of Corrections (DOC), appeals as of right the Court of Claims order denying its motion for summary disposition of plaintiffs allegation of cruel or unusual punishment in violation of the Michigan Constitution. On appeal, the DOC contends that plaintiffs failure to file the statutorily required notice of intent to file a claim within six months of the alleged injury bars this lawsuit where the complaint was not filed until nearly 28 months after the alleged injury first occurred. Because we hold that the statutory notice requirement of MCL 600.6431 applies to…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Burnett v. GrattanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Smith v. Department of Public HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bauserman v. Unemployment Ins. AgencyMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
- Progress Michigan v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Melissa Mays v. Governor Rick SnyderMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
- Bauserman v. Unemployment Ins. AgencyMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
- Department of Environmental Quality v. Hernan F GomezMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.