Legal Opinion

Paddock v. Clay

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1960No. 10061PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This action seeks restitution of certain described premises, and for treble damages for loss of rents because of alleged acts of defendant in taking possession of the premises after the death of Hartney, the tenant. Plaintiff is the executor of the estate of Hartney.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff was entitled to the possession and occupancy of the premises at the times referred to in the complaint; that plaintiff was offered $35 per month for the rental of the property and alleges that amount as the extent of his damages per month.

The answer was a general denial, and an affirmative…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hancock v. MaurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Dugand v. MagnusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mendes v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Spinks v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Mendes v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API