Paddock v. Clay
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman
This action seeks restitution of certain described premises, and for treble damages for loss of rents because of alleged acts of defendant in taking possession of the premises after the death of Hartney, the tenant. Plaintiff is the executor of the estate of Hartney.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff was entitled to the possession and occupancy of the premises at the times referred to in the complaint; that plaintiff was offered $35 per month for the rental of the property and alleges that amount as the extent of his damages per month.
The answer was a general denial, and an affirmative…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hancock v. MaurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Dugand v. MagnusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mendes v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Spinks v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Mendes v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978