People v. Maes
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.
Defendants are husband and wife. They visited a San Francisco department store. When they left, Mrs. Maes carried two dresses for which neither of them had paid. They were charged with conspiracy to commit petty theft. Although a jury found them guilty of the charged felony, they were admitted to probation on condition that each serve time in county jail. Both appeal.
Twelve jurors were selected and sworn just before the noon recess. Early in the afternoon session, a woman juror made audible comments. She interrupted one answer by the witness. Recess was taken and the talkative juror was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. RagsdaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. PecharCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. TraugottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. TrejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.