People v. Clark
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The defendant has appealed from an order of court denying his motion to vacate the judgment of commitment which was rendered against him upon conviction of two felonies. It is contended the court was without jurisdiction to render the judgment for the reason that the verdict was returned by only eleven jurors. One of the twelve jurors sworn to try the case became ill and was unable to complete the case. By consent of both parties, including the defendant and his attorney, in open court the absence of the sick juror was waived.
In March, 1931, the defendant was charged by an information filed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Schick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- People v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. WrothWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. KnappMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. RagsdaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Rucker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.