Legal Opinion

People v. Pechar

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1955No. Crim. 3027PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of violating Penal Code, section 288, rendered by the court sitting without a jury. At the outset appellant presents the argument that the record does not show a waiver of jury trial in the manner provided in article I, section 7 of the California Constitution, which requires such waiver to be “expressed in open court by the defendant and his counsel.” This has been construed repeatedly to require an express as distinguished from an implied consent to the waiver by the defendant personally, as well as by his counsel. (People v. Garcia, 98…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. People v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. People v. Metropolitan Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  4. People v. SpinatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. People v. WilkersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. People v. MosquedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. People v. LangdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Henry Hughes v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API