Legal Opinion

People v. Ragsdale

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1960No. Crim. 3630PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Appellant is represented by court-appointed counsel who has presented his arguments with commendable zeal and lawyer-like completeness. Appellant Ragsdale and his codefendant Underhill were charged by indictment with the felony denounced by Penal Code, section 288a (oral sexual copulation). Defendant Underhill’s appeal has been voluntarily dismissed. The two defendants were prisoners in San Quentin Prison at the time the alleged offense occurred. There was explicit eyewitness testimony of the commission of the prohibited act in a prison cell on March 9, 1958. Forthwith commencing on that day…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Osmulski v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. People v. HurdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. DiazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. AguirreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API