People v. Ames
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, J.
The sole issue is whether appellant effectively waived her right to be tried by a jury of 12 people. The trial which had begun with 12 jurors was completed with 11 jurors because one juror was excused while the trial was in progress with no alternate available.
During defense counsel’s closing argument the judge noticed that one of the jurors had been sleeping. A recess was called and both counsel and appellant met in chambers whereupon the following took place:
“The Court: I have noticed and I have sat there watching for about the better part of an hour, Mrs. Spellman, Juror…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. BrunemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. GuzmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. StegallWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. TraugottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. WatersColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. TrejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.