Smith v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Plaintiff argues that there was a question for the jury regarding whether his recovery was barred by his failure to comply with the policy’s proof of loss requirements and that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. We agree.
G.S. 58476(c) sets out the terms which must be included in the kind of fire insurance policy involved here. One of those provisions requires the insured to submit to the insurer a sworn proof of loss statement containing certain information within 60 days of the loss. Admittedly, plaintiff has failed to comply fully with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Henry v. DeenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Great American Insurance v. C. G. Tate Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- In Re WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Corwin v. British American Tobacco PLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Murdock v. Chatham CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Kimbrell v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Fournier v. Haywood County HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- McFadyen v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.