Legal Opinion

Murdock v. Chatham County

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 21, 2009No. COA08-809PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Chatham County’s Zoning Ordinance has the force of law; therefore, its provisions cannot be waived. A county planning board or official has no authority to modify the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance by interpretation. Chatham County was required to follow the correct procedural specifications, which required a thirty-day period between the filing of a proposed amendment and the hearing dates in amending its Zoning Ordinance. Plaintiffs had standing to challenge the Chatham County Board of Commissioners decision because they have presented sufficient evidence as to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Henry v. DeenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Mangum v. Raleigh Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Haynie v. CobbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Timber Integrated Investments, LLC v. WelchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Murdock v. Chatham CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Cent. Carolina Surgical Eye Assocs., P.A. v. MatthewsNorth Carolina Business Court · 2022
  5. Hall v. Henderson Cnty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API