Fournier v. Haywood County Hospital
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Judge.
The sole issue before us is whether plaintiff sufficiently set out his claim against Haywood County Hospital for medical malpractice. Plaintiff claims that his complaint sufficiently set out the standard of care, the acts and omissions of defendant, proximate cause and damages. Plaintiff argues his complaint, although “bare boned” in its content, is enough under our notice pleading requirements.
G.S. 1A-1, Rule 8(a)(1) requires only “a short and plain statement of the claim sufficiently particular to give the court and the parties notice of the transactions . . . showing that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- REDEVELOPMENT COM'N OF CITY OF WASHINGTON v. GrimesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Nolan v. BoulwareCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Smith v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Radcliffe v. Avenel Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Corwin v. British American Tobacco PLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016