Legal Opinion
Rose v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 30, 1989No. 88SC67PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey
We granted certiorari to review the judgment of the court of appeals in Rose v. Allstate Insurance Co., 754 P.2d 416 (Colo.Ct.App.1987), reversing the trial court’s finding that the petitioner, who was injured in an accident involving two automobiles, was a “pedestrian” within the meaning of section 10-4-703(9), 4A C.R.S. (1987), of the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (the Act). We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals, although for reasons other than those set forth in its opinion.
I
The facts of this case are not in dispute. On the evening of November 19, 1983, the petitioner…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nickerson v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Royal Globe Insurance v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Tyler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Bushnell v. SappSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. SteinColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Raitz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- MFA Mutual Insurance Co. v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Professional Affiliates Co. v. Farmers Insurance GroupColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.