Commonwealth v. Orellana
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
WECHT, J.:
Raul Orellana (“Orellana”) appeals from his April 16, 2013 judgment of sentence. We remanded this case to permit the Monroe County Public Defender’s office to file an “Anders/Santiago ’’-compliant brief.1 See Commonwealth v. Orellana, 1423 MDA 2013, slip op. at 5 (Pa.Super. Dec. 30, 2013). On remand, Orellana’s counsel has submitted an Anders brief and filed a petition to withdraw. We deny counsel’s motion. Additionally, we remand, again, due to counsel’s failure to comply with the requirements of Anders/Santiago. Specifically, counsel has identified a potentially…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Commonwealth v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by369 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Wolfe, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. BennettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. HankersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. SchmidtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
364 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.