Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hankerson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 8, 2015No. 938 EDA 2014PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DONOHUE, J.:

Tyshawn Hankerson (“Hankerson”) appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed following his convictions of robbery, burglary and conspiracy. His court-appointed counsel (“Counsel”) has filed á petition seeking to withdraw and a brief in support thereof pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and Commonwealth v. Santiago, 602 Pa. 159, 978 A.2d 349 (2009). Following our .review, we deny Counsel’s request, vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for resentencing..

We begin with the. relevant factual background, which the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. FlowersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. OrellanaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Com. v. Arnold, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Com. v. Arnold, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Com. v. Bartucci, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Com. v. Bartucci, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API