Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Schmidt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 14, 2017No. 1579 MDA 2016PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, P.J.E.:

Appellant, Joseph Schmidt, appeals from the judgment of sentence of 2 to 4 years’ incarceration, imposed after the trial court revoked his sentence of intermediate punishment stemming from his convictions of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), and fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer. On appeal, Appellant seeks to raise one issue challenging the discretionary aspects of his sentence. Additionally, his counsel, Douglas Vanston, Esq., seeks to withdraw his representation of Appellant pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 *1004L…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. GoodwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. FlowersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. NischanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DempsterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. YorgeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Com. v. Antonik, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Com. v. Arias, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. Brncik, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API