Legal Opinion

Village of Clarendon Hills v. Mulder

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 20, 1996No. 2 — 95 — 0715PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE McLAREN

delivered the opinion of the court:

After a hearing, the trial court granted Burke & Ryan’s petition to withdraw attorney fees from a condemnation fund. On appeal the mortgage lien holder, Arthur G. Jaros, Sr., argues that the trial court erred in granting Burke & Ryan’s motion to withdraw attorney fees because: (1) the fund doctrine does not apply to the facts of this case; (2) the appellant has a superior lien on the fund; and (3) compelling equities do not outweigh the first-in-time priority lien rule. We agree with the mortgagee and reverse.

The following facts are…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Baier v. State Farm Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Industrial Lift Truck Service Corp. v. Mitsubishi International Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. Harris's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Flynn v. KucharskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Brundidge v. Glendale Federal Bank, F.S.B.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hillenbrand v. Meyer Medical Group, SCAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. First American Title Insurance v. TCF Bank, F.A.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Morris B. Chapman & Associates, Ltd. v. KitzmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Owen Wagener & Co. v. U.S. BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Wendling v. Southern Illinois Hospital ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API