Legal Opinion
Hillenbrand v. Meyer Medical Group, SC
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 21, 1999No. 1-98-4433PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE HOFFMAN
delivered the opinion of the court:
The plaintiffs, Carmen Hillenbrand and James Uzzell, appeal the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Meyer Medical Group, S.C. (now known as Chicago Health System, Inc.) (Meyer) and Health Cost Controls of Illinois, Inc. (HCC). For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
The facts giving rise to the instant litigation are simple. Hillenbrand, as a federal employee, received comprehensive health care benefits under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Act (FEHBA) (5 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kerns v. EngelkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Busch v. Graphic Color Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Administrative Committee Of The Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Associates' Health And Welfare Plan v. Clara VarcoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Yu v. International Business MacHines Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Bishop v. BurgardIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Peart v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Arriola v. Time InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.