Legal Opinion
Owen Wagener & Co. v. U.S. Bank
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 30, 1998No. 1-97-3988PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson
Real estate brokers earn commissions by bringing together a willing buyer and a willing seller. But there is more to it than that, as this case demonstrates.
Owen Wagener & Co. (Wagener) appeals the trial court’s dismissal of its third amended complaint against U.S. Bank (the Bank) with prejudice under section 2 — 615 of the Civil Practice Law. 735 ILCS 5/2 — 615 (West 1992). Wagener contends it sufficiently pleaded claims for breach of express contract, breach of implied contract, and quantum meruit. We affirm the trial court.
FACTS
Lewis Kaplan (Kaplan) owned commercial property in the Village…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Doe v. Calumet CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Edens View Realty & Investment, Inc. v. Heritage Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Arthur Rubloff & Co. v. Drovers National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- FIRST NAT. BANK OF SPRINFIELD v. Malpractice Research, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Barry Mogul & Associates, Inc. v. Terrestris Development Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Khan v. BDO Seidman, LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Installco, Inc. v. Whiting Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Canel and Hale, Ltd. v. TobinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- McMahon v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Cable America, Inc. v. Pace Electronics, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.