Legal Opinion

Meier v. Paul X. Smith Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1962No. Civ. 19915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

In this action brought by the seller’s assignee to recover from the buyer the balance due on the sale of two used copra expellers, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment, after a non jury trial, which, while in plaintiff’s favor, is in a reduced amount because of offsets allowed the buyer for damages for the seller’s breach of warranties.

The action was brought on behalf of Edward T. Pittock, doing business as Pittock and Associates, who claimed from the buyer Paul X. Smith Corporation, under a written contract, the sum of $16,500 plus interest on an original purchase price of $24,000 for both…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Dewhirst v. LeopoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Futrell v. Payday California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Versaci v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. California Steel Buildings, Inc. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Goodman v. Community Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API