Jasnowski v. Judge of Recorder's Court
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus by Charles H. Jasnowski, prosecuting attorney of Wayne county, against William F. Connolly, recorder of the city of Detroit, requiring respondent to set aside an order quashing an information.
1Opinion of the CourtBibd, J.
Frank G. Lafer, a retail dealer in groceries in the city of. Detroit, was informed against for having violated Act No. 276, Pub. Acts 1913 (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 15049). A motion to quash the information was interposed, on the ground that the act was unconstitutional. The motion was granted, and the prosecuting attorney has moved this court for a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to set aside its order. The attack upon the statute is aimed at the title. It is said the title is invalid because it violates the constitutional provision that “no law shall embrace more than one object,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BeckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- State ex rel. Miller v. Board of CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Judson v. City of BessemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Boyer v. Grand Rapids Fire-Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Strauss v. HeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Parisian Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- People v. AustinMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Levy v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Liberty Highway Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.