Legal Opinion

Liberty Highway Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Commission

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 11, 1923No. 593PublishedCited by 21 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Riberty Highway Company, an Ohio corporation, and Edward Kabel, a citizen of Ohio, against the Michigan Public Utilities Commission, the five members of the Commission as,individuals, Andrew B. Dougherty, Attorney General of the state of Michigan, the prosecuting attorneys of Wayne, Ingham, Oakland, and Monroe Gpunties, Mich., and the commander and one of the members of the Michigan state police, to enjoin the enforcement by the defendants of an act of…

Read the full summary

In Equity. Suit by the Riberty Highway Company, an Ohio corporation, and Edward Kabel, a citizen of Ohio, against the Michigan Public Utilities Commission, the five members of the Commission as,individuals, Andrew B. Dougherty, Attorney General of the state of Michigan, the prosecuting attorneys of Wayne, Ingham, Oakland, and Monroe Gpunties, Mich., and the commander and one of the members of the Michigan state police, to enjoin the enforcement by the defendants of an act of the Michigan state legislature. On motion for preliminary injunction. The plaintiff Liberty Highway Company is an Ohio…

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs seek to have enforcement of Act 209 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1923 enjoined upon the ground of its alleged unconstitutionality, both under the Michigan and the federal Constitutions. They contend: (1) That it violates section 21 of article 5 of the Constitution of Michigan, in that its real object is not expressed in the title, and in that it contains a plurality of objects. (2) That it violates the interstate commerce clause of the federal Constitution, in that it unlawfully regulates and burdens interstate commerce. (3) That the Federal Highway Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp.…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Selective Draft Law CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. State v. CaplanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  3. Iowa Motor Vehicle Ass'n v. Board of Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Bekins Van Lines, Inc. v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Inter-City Coach Lines Inc. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API