Legal Opinion

Strauss v. Heiss

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 26, 1878PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This suit is brought to enforce the personal liability of the appellee, as a stockholder of the Baltimore County Brewing, Malting and Distilling Company, for a debt due to the appellants by said corporation.

In addition to the general issue plea, and a plea of the Statute of Limitations, the defendant filed a third plea, alleging that before the first of April, 1872, and before the plaintiffs' debt was contracted, he had fully paid to the said corporation, the whole amount of his subscription to the capital stock of the company.

To this plea, the plaintiffs demurred, and upon joinder in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
  2. Berry v. Baltimore & Drum Point RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  3. Montel v. Consolidation Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1874

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rash v. AllenSuperior Court of Delaware · 1910
  2. Allers v. TittsworthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Crawford v. RohrerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  4. Jasnowski v. Judge of Recorder's CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State v. German Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API