Saravia v. Dynamex, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONDITIONALLY CERTIFY COLLECTIVE ACTION
WILLIAM ALSUP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
INTRODUCTION
In this putative wage-and-hour collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, plaintiff claims that he and other similarly-situated delivery drivers were misclassified as independent contractors and thereby denied minimum wage and overtime pay. Defendants jointly move to enforce arbitration clauses in the agreements that form the basis for plaintiffs claims. Plaintiff moves for conditional certification of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Conde v. Open Door Marketing, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Villalpando v. Exel Direct Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Perez v. DirecTV Group Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Bell v. Arise Virtual Solutions, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022
- Bielski v. Coinbase Global, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.