Villalpando v. Exel Direct Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE MOTIONS IN LIMINE
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
In preparation for a jury trial that commences on May 31, 2016, the parties have filed fifteen motions in limine (“the Motions”). The Court’s rulings on the Motions are set forth below.1
II. ANALYSIS
Many of the parties’ motions in limine relate to a relatively small number of highly contentious issues. Therefore, the Court starts its analysis by addressing these issues and then addresses the remaining motions in limine individually.2
*877A. General Legal Standards Governing Motions in Limine
In the Motions, the parties…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gentry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Estrada v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Espejo v. Copley Press, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Huawei Techs., Co. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Bowerman v. Field Asset Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- In re Certified Tire & Serv. Ctrs. Wage & Hour Cases, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Certified Tire and Service Centers Wage and Hour CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.