Legal Opinion

Villalpando v. Exel Direct Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 20, 2016No. Case No. 12-cv-04137-JCSPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE MOTIONS IN LIMINE

JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

In preparation for a jury trial that commences on May 31, 2016, the parties have filed fifteen motions in limine (“the Motions”). The Court’s rulings on the Motions are set forth below.1

II. ANALYSIS

Many of the parties’ motions in limine relate to a relatively small number of highly contentious issues. Therefore, the Court starts its analysis by addressing these issues and then addresses the remaining motions in limine individually.2

*877A. General Legal Standards Governing Motions in Limine

In the Motions, the parties…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Gentry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Estrada v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Espejo v. Copley Press, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Huawei Techs., Co. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  3. Bowerman v. Field Asset Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
  4. In re Certified Tire & Serv. Ctrs. Wage & Hour Cases, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Certified Tire and Service Centers Wage and Hour CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API