Legal Opinion

Bielski v. Coinbase Global, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 8, 2022No. 3:21-cv-07478Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 ABRAHAM BIELSKI, 11 Plaintiff, No. C 21-07478 WHA 12 v. 13 COINBASE, INC., ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 In this action accusing defendant cryptocurrency exchange platform of violating the 19 Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E, defendant moves to compel arbitration. 20 Because the delegation clause and the broader arbitration provision are unconscionable for the 21 same reasons, the motion is DENIED. 22 STATEMENT 23 Defendant Coinbase, Inc. operates a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Circuit City Stores, Inc. A Virginia Corporation v. Saint Clair Adams, a California ResidentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API