Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Weiss v. R. Hoe & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 19, 1940No. 121PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

This litigation involves three patents to Adolph Weiss relating to rotary intaglio printing machines. Speedry Gravure Corporation 'is exclusive licensee under the Weiss patents. The defendant R. Hoe & Co., Inc., is the manufacturer and the other defendant is a user of the machines alleged to infringe. For convenience the patents in suit will be designated “first”, “second” and “third” in accordance with their chronological development by Weiss. The first patent is Reissue No. 18,856, granted June 6, 1933, on an application for reissue filed September 10, 1932. It is a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Cantrell v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Lyman Mfg. Co. v. Bassick Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
  5. Patent Royalties Corp. v. Land O'Lakes Creameries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Aero Spark Plug Co. v. BG CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Bewal, Inc., a Corporation of Kansas and Benjamine C. Edwards, Jr. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
  3. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Proctor Electric Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1962
  4. Toy Ideas, Inc. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1959
  5. Moss v. Patterson-Ballagh Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API