Legal Opinion
Moss v. Patterson-Ballagh Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 21, 1950No. Civ. No. 5572PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINBERGER, District Judge.
This cause arises under the patent laws of the United States; the original complaint was filed by Perry M. Moss, as inventor and patentee, against Patterson-Ballagh Corporation, as the alleged infringer, for damages, etc., for infringement of Letters Patent No. 2,190,880. Since the filing of that complaint, Perry M. Moss has assigned to Phoebe E. Moss, his wife, all his right, title and interest in and to said Letters Patent, including the right' to recover for past infringement of said patent, and Byron Jackson Co. has acquired , the assets of Patterson-Ballagh…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Patterson-Ballagh Corp. v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Marks v. Polaroid CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955
- Darlington v. Studebaker-Packard Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1961
- C.E. Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Ray v. Ripley School TownshipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970