Legal Opinion
Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Proctor Electric Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 15, 1962No. Civ. A. 10181PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.
This case involves claims by plaintiff for infringement of patents relating to electrostatic spray-coating systems, and counterclaims by defendants for declarations that said patents are invalid, and are not infringed. The actual devices developed by plaintiff and defendants are used solely in the field of electrostatic painting, and except with respect to a discussion of the prior art, only that field need be considered.
Background — Parties.
Plaintiff Ransburg Electro-Coating Corporation (plaintiff, or Ransburg) is an Indiana corporation organized on January…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- Eames v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Diamond International Corporation v. WalterhoeferDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
- Bowser, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Porter-Cable MacHine Co. v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1967
- Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Ionic Electrostatic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Maschinenfabrik Rieter A. G. v. Greenwood MillsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.