Legal Opinion
Union Oil Co. v. O'RILEY
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 13, 1990No. B028866PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GOERTZEN, J.
On October 24, 1989, we dismissed this appeal, finding that the federal courts exercise exclusive jurisdiction over cases based upon violations of the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (PMPA), 15 United States Code section 2801 et seq. Defendant/Cross-complainant/respondent Patrick M. O’Riley successfully petitioned the United States Supreme Court for writ of certiorari. The United States Supreme Court vacated our earlier judgment and remanded the cause to us for further consideration in light of Tafflin v. Levitt (1990) 493 U.S. 455 [107 L.Ed.2d 887, 110 S.Ct. 792], Upon…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Tafflin v. LevittSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Gilderhus v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
- Rustom v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Meyer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc. v. DavisDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1993
- Hannon v. Exxon Co., USADistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Grotemyer v. Lake Shore Petro Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Meyer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017