Legal Opinion

Harstad v. Metcalf

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1960No. 35009PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

— This is an action for an accounting upon the dissolution of a partnership. Appellant James I. Metcalf is an electrical engineer. Respondent H. T. Harstad is a civil engineer. They orally formed a professional engineering partnership in 1950. The professional services were largely performed for municipal corporations on sanitary, hydro electric and drainage projects. The partnership business had an unusual aspect in that such projects required preliminary studies, plans, and estimates of costs before their feasibility could be determined. Accordingly, the partnership customarily invested…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. GatterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Pollock v. RalstonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Hardman v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Kalez v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Engel v. VernonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Green v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Green v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Berg v. SettleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Fine v. LabandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API