Legal Opinion

Green v. McAllister

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 9, 2000No. 18526-5-IIIPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

This is a partnership dispute. Harry A. Green sued his former partners for breach of an agreement called a “Letter of Understanding.” He claimed damages based on a breach of the agreement. Following a jury verdict in favor of Green, the court nonetheless ordered an unconditional remittitur. The first question before us is whether the jury’s verdict is supported by the evidence. It is. The next question is whether the trial judge abused her discretion by ordering a remittitur without a finding that the verdict resulted from jury passion or prejudice. She did. We, accordingly, reverse that…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Humphrey Industries, Ltd. v. Clay Street Associates, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Hill v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Hill v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Burns v. McClintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Burns v. McClintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API