Legal Opinion

Hardman v. Brown

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1929No. 21620. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

On February 24, 1914, one Joseph Levinson was engaged in the liquor business in the city of Seattle. He was indebted to various persons for liquors purchased by him, the aggregate sum of which was $30,479.82. On the date named, Levinson entered into an agreement with the respondent Charles R. Brown by which he appointed Brown trustee for the benefit of his creditors, and assigned to Brown his liquor business and the stock of liquors he then had on hand. He also made and delivered to Brown his promissory note for the total sum of his indebtedness. Brown took possession of the assigned property…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Large v. Hayes by and Through NesbittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Estate of RaphaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. In Re the Proceedings for the Discipline of SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Harstad v. MetcalfWashington Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API