Legal Opinion

Berlin v. Herbert

Nassau County District Court

Decided December 1, 1965PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Zipper, J.

Respondent and Ms wife were tenants by the entirety of the premises involved herein, a one-family house. Respondent’s interest in the premises was sold by virtue of an execution to the Viking Supply Corporation, petitioner’s grantor. The petitioner in his petition requests that a final judgment be made awarding petitioner and the co-owner (respondent’s wife) possession of the premises and that a warrant issue to remove the respondent from possession of the premises.

With reference to the relief requesting the award to petitioner and the co-owner of possession, such relief is not warranted in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Austin v. . AhearneNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Finnegan v. HumesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. Finnegan v. HumesNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Finnegan v. HumesNew York Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harris v. CrowderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re WeissUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  3. Hoyt v. American Traders, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Teitelbaum v. Parameswaran (In Re Parameswaran)District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  5. Kirschenbaum v. Feola (In Re Feola)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API