Legal Opinion
Finnegan v. Humes
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 1937PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Smith (E. N.), J.
The action is one of ejectment. The case was upon trial calendar, the parties stipulated that there was no *841question of fact for the consideration of a jury, a jury was waived, and the trial was by the court upon the following agreed state of facts:
“ 1. That on or about the 16th day of May, 1930, Fred L. Smith conveyed the land and premises described in the complaint herein to defendants as husband and wife, and defendants thereupon became the owners of said land and premises as tenants by the entirety.
“ 2. That on or about the 9th day of September, 1931, the plaintiff duly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Bertles v. . NunanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Chandler v. CheneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- In Re the Appraisal, Under the Transfer Tax Law, of the Estate of LyonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Meeker v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Huber v. HuberNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Community National Bank & Trust Co. of New York v. Persky (In Re Persky)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Berlin v. HerbertNassau County District Court · 1965
- In Re HeaneyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- In re the Estate of DickieNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.