Legal Opinion
Finnegan v. Humes
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 5, 1937PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSears, P. J.
The action is for ejectment.
On the 16th day of May, 1930, the defendants, who are husband and wife, received a deed of the premises in question and became the owners of the land as tenants by the entirety. On September 9, 1931, the plaintiff was granted a judgment against the defendant James L. Humes, and a few days later a transcript of this judgment was filed and the judgment docketed in the Lewis county clerk’s office in which county the premises are located. On the 26th day of April, 1932, the defendants deeded the premises to a third party who, on the same day, conveyed the premises to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of KlatzlNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Gilman v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Zubler v. PorterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Mardt v. ScharmachNew York Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by39 opinions
- In Re Bernard Persky and Stuart Persky, Debtors. Community National Bank and Trust Company of New York v. Stuart Persky and Ronnie PerskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Sweeney, Cohn, Stahl & Vaccaro v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In Re WeissUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Lawriw v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Rothschild v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.