Legal Opinion
PHRASAVANG v. Deutsche Bank
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 23, 2009No. Civil Action 09-0064 (RMU)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Granting Option One and Encore’s Partial Motions to Dismiss; Granting in Part and Denying in Part Deutsche Bank and SPS’s Motion to Dismiss; Dismissing Counts II, IV and VIII Sua Sponte as to Option One; Dismissing Counts II and IV Sua Sponte as to Encore
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendants’ motions to dismiss. The plaintiff, Pouth Phrasavang, owned a property located in the District of Columbia upon which defendant Deutsche Bank initiated foreclosure and eviction proceedings. The plaintiffs complaint focuses…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Greer v. Board of Trustees University of District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Daniel Logan v. LaSalle Bank National AssociationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Onyeoziri v. SpivokDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Wilson v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.