In Re Rice
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LENROOT, Associate Judge.
This appeal brings before us for review a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting, upon the grounds hereinafter stated, claims 17 to 29, inclusive, of appellant’s application for a patent. No claims were allowed.
Claim 17 is illustrative of the subject matter of the claims before us and reads as follows: “17. The art of writing sheet music which comprises reproducing upon a paper sheet a plurality of spaced charts consisting of a pictorial representation of a portion of a piano keyboard,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cincinnati Traction Co. v. PopeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- In re WagenhorstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- In Re SterlingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- In Re ReevesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- In Re McKeeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- In re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- Application of MontgomeryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954