Legal Opinion
In Re McKee
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 24, 1933No. Patent Appeal 3109PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
The Primary Examiner in the United States Patent Office rejected all the claims of appellant’s application for a patent for im-Xirovement in meat products and the method of marking same. The Board of Appeals affirmed the action of the Examiner, and, from the decision of the Board, appeal is taken here.
Claims 3, 9, 10, 11, and 12 are drawn to cover an article namely, a pieee of meat bearing a series of identifying marks arranged in a certain manner for the purpose of identifying the meat. Claims 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17 are directed to the method of marking the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cincinnati Traction Co. v. PopeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- In Re ReevesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- In Re RussellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- In Re DixonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- In re ClarkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re: DistefanoCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- In Re PattonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- In Re SterlingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- In Re RiceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942