Legal Opinion
In re Curtis
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided February 28, 1964No. Nos. 64 C 53(3), 64 C 53(2), 64 C 54(3)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEREDITH and REGAN, District Judges.*
The petitioners in these causes applied for writs of habeas corpus alleging that they are unlawfully restrained of their liberty in violation of the Constitution of the United States. The pleadings show that the petitioners are in the custody of the Warden of the City Jail of the City of St. Louis pursuant to orders-of commitment served upon him by the Sheriff of the City of St. Louis on October 25, 1963, issued out of the Circuit-Court of the City of St. Louis, State of' Missouri, Division 2, presided over by Honorable Michael J. Scott, Judge. Petitioners…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Carbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Curtis v. BoegerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Ford v. BoegerDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1964
- Bruce v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
- Robert B. Curtis, William L. Clay, Lucien Richards, Rev. Charles Perkins and Norman Seay v. William Boeger, Warden of St. Louis City Jail. Louis Ford, Ian Grand, Benjamin Goins, Roberta Tournour, Taylor Jones, Kennethlee and Ronald Glenn v. William Boeger, Warden of St. Louis City Jail. Michela Grand, Daniel Pollock and James Peake, Jr. v. William Boeger, Warden of St. Louis City JailCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964