Legal Opinion
Curtis v. Boeger
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 6, 1964No. Nos. 17599-17601PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
These appeals were taken from the orders of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri denying appellants’ petitions for writs of habeas corpus on the ground that appellants had failed to exhaust all remedies available to them in the Courts of the State of Missouri. In re Curtis’ Petition, D.C., 227 F.Supp. 438.
The issue is narrowly confined to ascertaining whether it was necessary for *676appellants to apply to the Supreme Court of the United States for writ of certio-rari from the order of the Supreme Court of Missouri denying them relief, before they were entitled to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- In re CurtisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1964
3Cited by9 opinions
- William L. Maxwell v. Dan D. Stephens, Superintendent of Arkansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- William L. Maxwell v. O. E. Bishop, Superintendent, Arkansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Ford v. BoegerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Cleophus Young v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States ex rel. Bland v. NennaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.