Legal Opinion
Turevsky v. FixtureOne Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 19, 2012No. Civil Action No. 10-cv-2911PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
JOYNER, Chief Judge.
Before this Court are Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 90), Defendant Iaconelli’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 91), and Plaintiffs Response thereto (Doc. No. 94). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Plaintiffs motion in part and denies it in part, and grants Defendant’s motion in part and denies it in part.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Rimma Turevsky (“Plaintiff’ or “Ms. Turevsky”) is the alleged victim of discrimination on the basis of sex and pregnancy.1 She worked for FixtureOne (“Defendant” or “FixtureOne”)…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kilbride Invs. Ltd. v. Cushman & Wakefield of Pa., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Andrichyn v. TD Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- CIOCCA v. HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- HARRELL v. SOLEBURY TOWNSHIPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- MAY v. PNC BANKDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.